adidas Runfalcon 2.0
Buy adidas Runfalcon 2.0 at today's best price (men's/women's)
8 minute read
Overview
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is a versatile running shoe designed for both casual and beginner runners. This model is part of the adidas Runfalcon family, known for its affordability and practicality.
Key Features:
- Comfortable Upper: The padded upper provides a snug fit and prevents heel slippage.
- Durable Outsole: The rubber outsole offers excellent grip on various surfaces.
- Firm Midsole: The EVA (Ethylene Vinyl Acetate) midsole ensures a stable and firm ride.
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is an ideal choice for runners who prioritize comfort and stability for daily running. Its durable outsole offers reliable traction, making it suitable for road running.
Based on our monitoring of prices across the internet, it's currently in the cheapest 10% of running shoes today.
Verdict
The consensus on the adidas Runfalcon 2.0
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is a solid choice for casual runners and beginners who run short distances. Its comfortable, padded upper ensures a snug fit without heel slippage, and the durable rubber outsole provides excellent grip on both dry and wet surfaces. However, the shoe lacks breathability, making it less suitable for long runs in hot weather. The firm EVA midsole offers stability but falls short in responsiveness and cushioning, which may not appeal to experienced runners. The shoe's flexibility is commendable, but it stiffens significantly in cold weather. Overall, the Runfalcon 2.0 is a good budget-friendly option for low-mileage runners, but it may not meet the needs of those seeking advanced performance features. For its price, the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 offers decent value for casual and beginner runners.
Updates to adidas Runfalcon 2.0
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 features several updates from its predecessor, the adidas Runfalcon. The upper has been redesigned for a more comfortable and secure fit, with additional padding in the tongue and heel areas. The midsole remains firm but now offers a slightly better ground feel. The outsole has been improved for better grip and durability, although it still lacks the premium Continental rubber found in higher-end models. Overall, these updates make the Runfalcon 2.0 a more comfortable and stable option for casual runners.
Comparable Shoes
The Nike Pegasus 40 is a good alternative for runners seeking a more responsive and cushioned ride. Unlike the firm EVA midsole of the Runfalcon 2.0, the Pegasus 40 features a softer foam that provides better energy return and comfort for longer runs. It also offers superior breathability, making it a better option for hot weather. However, the Runfalcon 2.0 is more budget-friendly, making it a suitable choice for those on a tight budget.
The adidas Ultraboost Light offers better stability and cushioning compared to the Runfalcon 2.0. It features a Boost midsole that provides excellent energy return and comfort for long-distance runs. The Ultraboost Light is also more breathable, making it suitable for hot weather. However, it comes at a higher price point, which may not be ideal for budget-conscious runners.
The adidas Adizero SL is a versatile shoe that offers a moderately firm ride with better responsiveness than the Runfalcon 2.0. It is suitable for both daily training and faster runs, making it a more versatile option. The Adizero SL also features a more breathable upper, providing better comfort during long runs. However, it is priced higher than the Runfalcon 2.0, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious runners.
The adidas Adizero Adios Pro 3 is a high-performance racing shoe designed for speed. It features a lightweight construction and a responsive midsole that provides excellent energy return. Unlike the Runfalcon 2.0, the Adios Pro 3 is suitable for race-day performance and fast-paced runs. However, it comes at a significantly higher price point, making it less suitable for casual or budget-conscious runners.
The Hoka Solimar is an all-rounder shoe that offers a balanced combination of cushioning and responsiveness. It features a softer midsole compared to the firm EVA of the Runfalcon 2.0, providing better comfort for longer runs. The Solimar is also more breathable, making it suitable for hot weather. However, it is priced higher than the Runfalcon 2.0, which may be a consideration for those on a tight budget.
Special versions of adidas Runfalcon 2.0
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 TR is a trail version of the Runfalcon 2.0, designed for off-road running. It features a more rugged outsole with deeper lugs for better traction on uneven terrain. The upper is also reinforced for added durability and protection against trail debris. While it shares the same EVA midsole for a firm and stable ride, the TR version is better suited for trail running, offering enhanced grip and durability compared to the standard Runfalcon 2.0.
8 adidas Runfalcon 2.0 Pros & Cons
4 Pros
4 Cons
In Depth
Upper
The upper of the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is designed for comfort and support. It features a padded tongue and heel that hug the foot nicely, preventing heel slippage. The mesh material is flexible, allowing it to stretch to the foot's shape, but it lacks breathability, which can cause discomfort during longer runs. Despite this, the upper provides a secure fit, making it suitable for daily running.
Midsole
The midsole of the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is made from EVA (Ethylene Vinyl Acetate), a lightweight foam that offers a firm and stable ride. While it provides adequate cushioning for short runs, it lacks the responsiveness and energy return found in higher-end models. This makes it less suitable for fast-paced or long-distance runs. The 10 mm heel-to-toe drop helps in maintaining a natural stride, but the overall firmness may not appeal to all runners.
Outsole
The outsole of the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is made from durable rubber, providing excellent grip on road surfaces. The multidirectional tread pattern enhances stability, even at higher paces. Although it doesn't feature the premium Continental rubber found in some other adidas models, it still offers reliable traction and durability for road running.
Size/fit
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 runs true to size but has a narrower fit compared to other models. The toe box is medium in width, providing a snug fit without feeling too tight. The shoe's overall fit is comfortable, with ample padding in the tongue and heel areas. However, runners with wider feet may find it a bit restrictive.
Comfort
Comfort is a strong point for the adidas Runfalcon 2.0. The padded upper and tongue provide a snug fit, while the EVA midsole offers a firm yet stable ride. The shoe requires no break-in period, making it comfortable right out of the box. However, the lack of breathability can cause discomfort during longer runs, especially in hot weather.
Cushioning
The cushioning in the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is provided by the EVA midsole, which offers a firm and stable ride. While it is adequate for short runs, it lacks the plushness and responsiveness found in higher-end models. This makes it less suitable for long-distance or fast-paced runs, but it is sufficient for daily training.
Breathability
Breathability is a weak point for the adidas Runfalcon 2.0. The upper mesh material is thick and lacks ventilation holes, resulting in minimal airflow. This can cause the feet to feel hot and uncomfortable during longer runs, especially in warm weather. Runners looking for a more breathable option may need to consider other models.
Stability
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 offers good stability for neutral runners. The firm midsole and secure fit of the upper help maintain a stable ride, even for those who slightly overpronate (experience excessive inward rolling of the foot during walking or running). However, it may not provide enough support for runners with severe overpronation. The shoe's narrower fit also contributes to a guided and stable experience.
Durability
Durability is a mixed bag for the adidas Runfalcon 2.0. While the rubber outsole is durable and provides excellent grip, the upper mesh material is relatively thin and may show signs of wear over time. The EVA midsole also lacks resilience, potentially feeling flimsy after extended use. Runners seeking long-lasting cushioning and support may need to consider other options.
Grip
The grip of the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is superb, especially on road and concrete surfaces. The rubber outsole provides reliable traction, even in wet conditions. Although it doesn't feature the premium Continental rubber found in some other adidas models, it still offers excellent security and stability for road running.
Who should buy the adidas Runfalcon 2.0?
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is ideal for casual runners and beginners who run short distances. It is also suitable for those on a tight budget looking for a comfortable and stable shoe for daily running. Runners who prefer a firmer foam and some ground feel will appreciate the EVA midsole. Additionally, those who need a shoe with a removable insole for custom orthotics will find this model accommodating.
Who should not buy the adidas Runfalcon 2.0?
Experienced runners or those who run long distances may find the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 lacking in responsiveness and cushioning. Runners who overpronate should consider other models like the adidas Ultraboost Light for better stability. Those seeking a more breathable shoe for hot weather runs may also want to look elsewhere. If you need a shoe with advanced performance features, the adidas Adizero SL or Adizero Adios Pro 3 might be better options.
adidas Runfalcon 2.0: What's it good for?
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is good for short and slow runs, making it ideal for base runs where the goal is to accumulate mileage. It is also suitable for daily training and casual running, providing a comfortable and stable ride. The shoe performs well on road surfaces, offering excellent grip and traction. However, it is not designed for race-day performance or fast-paced runs.
5 adidas Runfalcon 2.0 FAQs
Is the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 suitable for long-distance running?
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is not ideal for long-distance running due to its firm midsole and lack of responsiveness. It is better suited for short and slow runs.
Does the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 have good breathability?
No, the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 lacks breathability due to its thick mesh upper, which can cause discomfort during longer runs in hot weather.
Is the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 good for beginners?
Yes, the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 is a good option for beginners due to its comfortable fit, stable ride, and budget-friendly price.
Can I use custom orthotics with the adidas Runfalcon 2.0?
Yes, the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 has a removable insole, making it compatible with custom orthotics.
How does the adidas Runfalcon 2.0 perform in wet conditions?
The adidas Runfalcon 2.0 performs well in wet conditions, offering excellent grip and traction on road surfaces.
 Now viewing | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bestDeal | Show prices | |||||
| priceBand | Price band | |||||
| similarity | Similarity | Very similar | Very similar | Very similar | Very similar | Very similar |
| released | ReleasedMar 2021 | May 2021 | Apr 2019 | Oct 2018 | Aug 2022 | |
| expertReviewScore | Expert Review Score | |||||
| productAthletes | Pro athlete users |    | ||||
| Weight | Weight281 g | 261 g | M: 278 g W: 249 g | M: 249 g W: 215 g | M: 278 g W: 244 g | |
| Forefoot | Forefoot | 21 mm | 19 mm | 18 mm | 21 mm | |
| Heel to toe drop | Heel to toe drop10 mm | 5 mm | 8 mm | 6 mm | 8 mm | |
| Heel | Heel | 26 mm | 27 mm | 24 mm | 29 mm | |
| Usages | UsagesDaily runningGym | CompetitionDaily runningRacingSpeed training | Daily runningRacingSpeed training | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running |
| Brand | Brandadidas | On | ASICS | Saucony | On | Brooks |
| Strike Type | Strike TypeHeel strike | Fore/Midfoot strikeHeel strike | Fore/Midfoot strikeHeel strike | Fore/Midfoot strikeHeel strike | Fore/Midfoot strikeHeel strike | Fore/Midfoot strikeHeel strike |
| Shoe Type | Shoe Type | Lightweight | ComfortableLightweight | |||
| Removable insole | Removable insole | |||||
| Breathable | Breathable | |||||
| Rocker | Rocker | |||||
| Waterproofings | Waterproofings | Waterproof | ||||
| Environmental Characteristics | Environmental Characteristics | Vegan Ⓥ | SustainableVegan Ⓥ | |||
Common characteristicsRoadNeutralNeutral pronationHigh archOrthotic friendly |
- Jul 2023
- Mar 2021
- Feb 2019
